Internal validity of any research design refers to the design's ability to make causal inferences from the data collected and the results of the study (Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002). The research designs that offer the highest levels of internal validity are true experiments where the participants are randomly assigned to the conditions in the study. Quasi-experimental designs attempt to improve on the poor internal validity of correlational designs by allowing the researcher to control the assignment of participants to the treatment condition such as using some type of eligibility criteria, but due to the nature of the study the researcher cannot use random assignment. Most quasi-experimental designs are performed with intact groups that cannot be the subject of any random assignment (Shadish et al., 2002). Metheny, Davis-Jackson, and Stewart (2010) performed a two-group quasi-experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an Aspiration Risk Reduction Protocol (ARRP) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated tube -- fed patients on an intensive...
Aside from the aforementioned problems with internal validity in quasi-experimental designs the Metheny et al. study has several threats to its internal validity:Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now